CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles

$100,000 ITF Women's Circuit tennis doubles tournament

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 27, 2022
Entity authorityQ17484290 ↗
Source-derived summary

Andrea Gámiz and Adriana Pérez were the defending champions, having won the previous event in 2011, but both players chose not to participate.

The second seeds Lara Arruabarrena and Florencia Molinero won the title, defeating Melanie Klaffner and Patricia Mayr-Achleitner in the final, 6–2, 6–0.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles” as $100,000 ITF Women's Circuit tennis doubles tournament. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Seguros, Bolívar and Bogotá.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Seguros, Bolívar and Bogotá providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “$100,000 ITF Women's Circuit tennis doubles tournament” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 27, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q17484290. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles primary sources, 2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles archive and Seguros research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2014 Seguros Bolívar Open Bogotá – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.