CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles

2014 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ17419548 ↗
Source-derived summary

Marcel Granollers was the defending champion, but lost in the quarterfinals to Dominic Thiem.

Unseeded David Goffin won the title, defeating Thiem in the final, 4–6, 6–1, 6–3.

Seeds

The top four seeds receive a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

“2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles” enters the record as 2014 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bet-at-home, Kitzbühel and Singles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 40-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bet-at-home, Kitzbühel and Singles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bet-at-home, Kitzbühel and Singles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17419548. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles primary sources, 2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles archive and Bet-at-home research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2014 Bet-at-home Cup Kitzbühel – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.