CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2014 Astana Challenger – Singles

2014 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 2, 2023
Entity authorityQ15739647 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dudi Sela was the defending champion, but chose to compete at the 2014 Delray Beach International Tennis Championships.

Andrey Golubev won the title, defeating Gilles Müller in the final, 6–4, 6–4.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2014 Astana Challenger – Singles” is 2014 tennis event results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Astana, Challenger and Singles, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Astana, Challenger and Singles is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2014 tennis event results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 2, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q15739647. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2014 Astana Challenger – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2014 Astana Challenger – Singles primary sources, 2014 Astana Challenger – Singles archive and Astana research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2014 Astana Challenger – Singles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2014 Astana Challenger – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.