CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles

WTA 125s tennis doubles tournament

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 14, 2018
Entity authorityQ14232759 ↗
Source-derived summary

Timea Bacsinszky and Caroline Garcia were the defending champions, but decided not to participate.

Tímea Babos and Michaëlla Krajicek won the title, defeating Han Xinyun and Eri Hozumi in the final 6–2, 6–2.

Editorial summary

“2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles” enters the record as wTA 125s tennis doubles tournament. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Suzhou, Ladies and Doubles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 33-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Suzhou, Ladies and Doubles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Suzhou, Ladies and Doubles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 14, 2018. The linked authority identifier is Q14232759. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles primary sources, 2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles archive and Suzhou research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2013 Suzhou Ladies Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.