CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles

2013 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 29, 2023
Entity authorityQ14405776 ↗
Source-derived summary

Evgeny Donskoy was the defending champion, but chose to participate at the 2013 Odlum Brown Vancouver Open instead.

Pablo Carreño Busta won the title, defeating Albano Olivetti in the final, 6–4, 7–6(7–2).

Editorial summary

“2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles” enters the record as 2013 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Castilla, León and Singles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Castilla, León and Singles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Castilla, León and Singles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 29, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q14405776. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles primary sources, 2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles archive and Castilla research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2013 Open Castilla y León – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.