CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles

2013 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 5, 2026
Entity authorityQ13622786 ↗
Source-derived summary

Devin Britton and Jeff Dadamo were defending champions, but Britton decided not to participate.

Dadamo teamed up with Mischa Zverev but lost to Kevin King and Juan Carlos Spir in the first round.

Editorial summary

“2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles” enters the record as 2013 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Nielsen, Tennis and Championship can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 33-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Nielsen, Tennis and Championship.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Nielsen, Tennis and Championship provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 5, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q13622786. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles primary sources, 2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles archive and Nielsen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2013 Nielsen Pro Tennis Championship – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.