2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs
Open-knowledge reference entry
The play-offs of the 2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I were the final stages of the Group I Zonal Competition involving teams from Asia and Oceania. Using the positions determined in their pools, the seven teams faced off to determine their placing in the 2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I. The top team advanced to the World Group II, and the bottom team was relegated down to the Group II for the next year.
Pool Standings
Promotion play-offs
The first placed teams of each pool were drawn in a head-to-head round. The winner of the round advanced to the World Group II play-offs, where they'd get a chance to advanced to World Group II.
Kazakhstan vs. Uzbekistan
3rd to 4th play-offs
The second placed teams of each pool were drawn in head-to-head rounds to find the third and fourth placed teams.
China vs. Thailand
Relegation play-offs
The last placed teams of each pool were drawn in a head-to-head round. The loser of each round was relegated down to Asia/Oceania Zone Group II in 2013.
India vs. South Korea
Final Placements
Kazakhstan advanced to the World Group II play-offs, and were drawn against France.
“2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Asia, Oceania and Zone can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Asia, Oceania and Zone provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 16, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q4629349. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs primary sources, 2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs archive and Asia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2013 Fed Cup Asia/Oceania Zone Group I – play-offs” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.