CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles

$50,000 ITF Women's Circuit tennis doubles tournament

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 20, 2023
Entity authorityQ11812505 ↗
Source-derived summary

Maria Fernanda Alves and Jessica Moore were the defending champions, having won the event in 2012, but they lost in the quarterfinals to Jan Abaza and Louisa Chirico.

Julia Cohen and Tatjana Maria, originally seeded second, withdrew before the tournament began and were not replaced. As a result, their opponents Shelby Rogers and Nicola Slater were given a bye into the second round.

Abaza and Chirico won the tournament, defeating Asia Muhammad and Allie Will in the final, 6–4, 6–4.

Editorial summary

“2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles” enters the record as $50,000 ITF Women's Circuit tennis doubles tournament. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Audi, Melbourne and Tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Audi, Melbourne and Tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Audi, Melbourne and Tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 20, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q11812505. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles primary sources, 2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles archive and Audi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2013 Audi Melbourne Pro Tennis Classic – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.