CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2013–14 Pro A season

basketball league season

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 20, 2025
Entity authorityQ15411075 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2013–14 LNB Pro A season was the 92nd season of the French Basketball Championship and the 27th season since inception of the Ligue Nationale de Basketball (LNB).

The regular season started on October 4, 2013 and ended on May 5, 2014. The Playoffs started on May 12. Limoges CSP won their 10th French title and their first since 2000. Strasbourg IG was runner-up.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2013–14 Pro A season” as basketball league season. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around season, basketball and league.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013, 2014, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with season, basketball and league providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2013–14 Pro A season”, the useful work is to connect “basketball league season” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 20, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q15411075. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013, 2014 and 2000.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2013–14 Pro A season”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2013–14 Pro A season primary sources, 2013–14 Pro A season archive and season research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2013–14 Pro A season”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2013–14 Pro A season” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.