CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2012 ITS Cup – Doubles

2012 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 17, 2022
Entity authorityQ3789900 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2012 ITS Cup Doubles was a professional tennis tournament played on outdoor clay courts in Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Michaëlla Krajicek and Renata Voráčová were the defending champions, but Krajicek chose not to participate. Therefore, Voráčová partnered up with Yuliya Beygelzimer, but lost in the final to Inés Ferrer Suárez and Richèl Hogenkamp 2–6, 6–7(4–7).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2012 ITS Cup – Doubles” as 2012 tennis event results. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Doubles, tennis and event can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 2012 tennis event results. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 17, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q3789900. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2012 ITS Cup – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2012 ITS Cup – Doubles primary sources, 2012 ITS Cup – Doubles archive and Doubles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2012 ITS Cup – Doubles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2012 ITS Cup – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.