2011 U-League
football league season
The 2011 U-League, officially known as 2011 Caffe Bene U-League, was the fourth football season of the U-League. The 69 participating universities were divided into 7 regional leagues, and the top 32 teams advanced to the "U-League Championship", the knockout stage of the U-League. The other 37 teams eliminated in the regional round also participated in the "U-League Friendship", another tournament made by Korea Football Association.
Regional round
Capital Area Central League
Capital Area Eastern League
Capital Area Western League
Central League
Yeongnam League
Honam League
Southern League
Playoff rounds
Four teams of the second playoff round qualified for the U-League Championship, and the other nine teams advanced to the U-League Friendship. Hanzhung University, Seonam University and Chodang University directly advanced to the second playoff round.
First playoff round
Second playoff round
Friendship
The draw for the U-League Friendship was held on 4 October 2011. Hoseo University withdrew from the tournament.
First round
Round of 32
Round of 16
Quarter-finals
Semi-finals
Final
Championship
The draw for the U-League Championship was held on 4 October 2011.
The public source identifies “2011 U-League” as football league season. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around U-League, football and league.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2011 U-League”, the useful work is to connect “football league season” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 3, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q4622666. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 U-League”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2011 U-League primary sources, 2011 U-League archive and U-League research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 U-League”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2011 U-League” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.