CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2011 Nashville mayoral election

American election in Tennessee

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ85729326 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2011 Nashville mayoral election took place on August 4, 2011. Incumbent Mayor Karl Dean, who was first elected in 2007, ran for re-election. He was originally challenged by Metro Councilman Michael Craddock, but Craddock dropped out of the race on May 26, 2011, citing fundraising difficulties. Following Craddock's withdrawal, Dean did not face serious opposition. He ended up winning re-election in a landslide, receiving 79 percent of the vote and avoiding the need for a runoff election.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2011 Nashville mayoral election” is american election in Tennessee. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Nashville, mayoral and election, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Nashville, mayoral and election is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american election in Tennessee” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q85729326. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 2007.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 Nashville mayoral election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2011 Nashville mayoral election primary sources, 2011 Nashville mayoral election archive and Nashville research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 Nashville mayoral election”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2011 Nashville mayoral election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.