CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2011 Meeting Areva

international athletics championship event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 1, 2025
Entity authorityQ3853880 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2011 Meeting Areva was the 27th edition of the annual outdoor track and field meeting in Saint-Denis, France. Held on 8 July at Stade de France, it was the eighth leg of the 2011 Diamond League – the highest level international track and field circuit.

Diamond events results

Podium finishers earned points towards a season leaderboard (4-2-1 respectively), points per event were then doubled in the Diamond League Finals. Athletes had to take part in the Diamond race during the finals to be eligible to win the Diamond trophy which is awarded to the athlete with the most points at the end of the season.

Men's

Women's

See also

2011 Diamond League

References

Results

"2011 Meeting Areva Results". World Athletics.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2011 Meeting Areva” as international athletics championship event. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Meeting, Areva and international can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as international athletics championship event. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 1, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3853880. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 Meeting Areva”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2011 Meeting Areva primary sources, 2011 Meeting Areva archive and Meeting research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 Meeting Areva”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2011 Meeting Areva” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.