CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2011 FORU Oceania Cup

rugby tournament

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 10, 2022
Entity authorityQ16823171 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2011 FORU Oceania Cup for national rugby union teams in the Oceania region was held in Papua New Guinea at the Lloyd Robson Oval in Port Moresby from 29 November to 3 December.

Papua New Guinea won the cup, retaining their title from 2009, by winning the round-robin tournament over Vanuatu, Solomon Islands, and Niue.

Editorial summary

“2011 FORU Oceania Cup” enters the record as rugby tournament. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what FORU, Oceania and rugby can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011, 2009—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around FORU, Oceania and rugby.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2011 FORU Oceania Cup” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, FORU, Oceania and rugby provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 10, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q16823171. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 2009.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 FORU Oceania Cup”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2011 FORU Oceania Cup primary sources, 2011 FORU Oceania Cup archive and FORU research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 FORU Oceania Cup”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2011 FORU Oceania Cup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.