CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen

cycling race

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ3717110 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen – Harelbeke took place on 26 March 2011. It was the 54th edition of the international classic E3 Prijs Vlaanderen – Harelbeke and is rated as a 1.HC event on the UCI Europe Tour. This edition was won by Leopard Trek's rider Fabian Cancellara.

Editorial summary

“2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen” enters the record as cycling race. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Prijs, Vlaanderen and cycling can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Prijs, Vlaanderen and cycling.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Prijs, Vlaanderen and cycling provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3717110. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2011.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen primary sources, 2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen archive and Prijs research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2011 E3 Prijs Vlaanderen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.