CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles

2011 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 29, 2024
Entity authorityQ2736261 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mahesh Bhupathi and Max Mirnyi were the defending champions, but decided not to participate together.

Bhupathi played alongside Leander Paes but were eliminated in the second round, while Mirnyi partnered up with Daniel Nestor but were eliminated in the semifinals.

In the final, Rohan Bopanna and Aisam-ul-Haq Qureshi won the title beating French wildcards Julien Benneteau and Nicolas Mahut 6–2, 6–4.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles” as 2011 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Paribas, Masters and Doubles.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 61-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Paribas, Masters and Doubles providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “2011 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 29, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q2736261. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles primary sources, 2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles archive and Paribas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2011 BNP Paribas Masters – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.