CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles

2011 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 25, 2022
Entity authorityQ3612545 ↗
Source-derived summary

Eleni Daniilidou and Jasmin Wöhr were the defending champions, but both chose not to participate.

Nina Bratchikova and Darija Jurak won the title, defeating Alexandra Cadanțu and Ioana Raluca Olaru 6–4, 7–5 in the final.

Editorial summary

“2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles” enters the record as 2011 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Allianz, Doubles and tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 35-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Allianz, Doubles and tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Allianz, Doubles and tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 25, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q3612545. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles primary sources, 2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles archive and Allianz research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2011 Allianz Cup – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.