CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2010–11 CERS Cup

international football competition

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 6, 2025
Entity authorityQ3691074 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2010–11 CERS Cup was the 31st season of the CERS Cup, Europe's second club roller hockey competition organized by CERH. 28 teams from nine national associations qualified for the competition as a result of their respective national league placing in the previous season. Following a preliminary phase and two knockout rounds, Benfica won the tournament at its final four, in Vilanova i la Geltrú, Spain, on 7 and 8 May 2011.

Preliminary phase

Knockout stage

The knockout stage consisted in double-legged series for the round of 16 and the quarterfinals, where the four winners would join the Final Four.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2010–11 CERS Cup” is international football competition. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through CERS, international and football, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 2011—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, CERS, international and football is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “international football competition” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 6, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3691074. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 2011.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2010–11 CERS Cup”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2010–11 CERS Cup primary sources, 2010–11 CERS Cup archive and CERS research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2010–11 CERS Cup”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2010–11 CERS Cup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.