CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2010 Tashkent Open – Singles

2010 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ3981329 ↗
Source-derived summary

Shahar Pe'er was the defending champion, but chose not to participate that year.Alla Kudryavtseva won in the final, 6–4, 6–4, against Elena Vesnina.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2010 Tashkent Open – Singles” as 2010 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Tashkent, Singles and tennis.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 23-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Tashkent, Singles and tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2010 Tashkent Open – Singles”, the useful work is to connect “2010 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3981329. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2010 Tashkent Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2010 Tashkent Open – Singles primary sources, 2010 Tashkent Open – Singles archive and Tashkent research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2010 Tashkent Open – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2010 Tashkent Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.