CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles

2010 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 22, 2023
Entity authorityQ3756011 ↗
Source-derived summary

Michael Kohlmann and Philipp Marx were the defending champions; however, they chose participating in ATP World Tour tournaments (Kohlmann in Memphis and Marx in Marseille).

Ilija Bozoljac and Jamie Delgado won in the final 6–3, 6–3, against Dustin Brown and Martin Slanar.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles” as 2010 tennis event results. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 42-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where GEMAX, Doubles and tennis can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 2010 tennis event results. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 22, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q3756011. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles primary sources, 2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles archive and GEMAX research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2010 GEMAX Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.