CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles

2009 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3947563 ↗
Source-derived summary

Brian Dabul chose to not defend his 2008 title.

Santiago Giraldo defeated Paolo Lorenzi in the final 6–2, 6–7(3), 6–2.

Editorial summary

“2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles” enters the record as 2009 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Luis, Potosí and Challenger can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2008—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Luis, Potosí and Challenger.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Luis, Potosí and Challenger provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3947563. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2008.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles primary sources, 2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles archive and Luis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2009 San Luis Potosí Challenger – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.