CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2009 Russian Super Cup

association football competition in Russia

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 14, 2025
Entity authorityQ4446272 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2009 Russian Super Cup was the 7th Russian Super Cup match, a football match which was contested between the 2008 Russian Premier League champion, Rubin Kazan, and the winner of 2007–08 Russian Cup, CSKA Moscow. The match was held on 7 March 2009 at the Luzhniki Stadium in Moscow, Russia. CSKA Moscow beat Rubin Kazan 2–1 in extra time, after the normal time had finished in a 1–1 draw, to win their fourth Russian Super Cup.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2009 Russian Super Cup” is association football competition in Russia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Russian, Super and association, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2008, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Russian, Super and association is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “association football competition in Russia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4446272. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2008 and 2007.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2009 Russian Super Cup”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2009 Russian Super Cup primary sources, 2009 Russian Super Cup archive and Russian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2009 Russian Super Cup”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2009 Russian Super Cup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.