2009 Asian Five Nations
Open-knowledge reference entry
The 2009 Asian Five Nations, known as the 2009 HSBC Asian 5 Nations due to its sponsorship by HSBC, was the second series of the rugby union Asian Five Nations, the flagship competition devised by the International Rugby Board to develop the sport in the Asian region. The tournament played a role in qualifying for the 2011 Rugby World Cup, with Singapore, the last place team, being relegated to Division 1. As the 2010 edition will serve as the final round of Asian qualifying, Singapore is effectively eliminated.
Changes from 2008
Arabian Gulf has been replaced with Singapore, who earns promotion from Division 1.
Teams
The teams involved, with their world rankings pre tournament, were:
Hong Kong (31)
Japan (16)
Kazakhstan (34)
South Korea (23)
Singapore (49)
Final Table
Scoring System
Win – 5 Points
Draw – 3 Points
Loss – 0 Points
Bonus points for scoring four tries or for losing by no more than 7 points.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2009 Asian Five Nations” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q727454. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2011, 2010 and 2008.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2009 Asian Five Nations”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2009 Asian Five Nations primary sources, 2009 Asian Five Nations archive and Asian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2009 Asian Five Nations”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2009 Asian Five Nations” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.