CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

44th Golden Bell Awards

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ15897157 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 44th Golden Bell Awards (Mandarin:第44屆金鐘獎) was held on October 16, 2009 at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan. The ceremony was broadcast live by TTV.

Winners and nominees

Below is the list of winners and nominees for the main categories.

Editorial summary

“44th Golden Bell Awards” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what 44th, Golden and Bell can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around 44th, Golden and Bell.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“44th Golden Bell Awards” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, 44th, Golden and Bell provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15897157. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “44th Golden Bell Awards”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 44th Golden Bell Awards primary sources, 44th Golden Bell Awards archive and 44th research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “44th Golden Bell Awards”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “44th Golden Bell Awards” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.