CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles

2008 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 1, 2024
Entity authorityQ3703750 ↗
Source-derived summary

Bob Bryan and Mike Bryan were the defending champions, but chose not to participate that year.

Mahesh Bhupathi and Mark Knowles won in the final 6–3, 6–3, against Christopher Kas and Philipp Kohlschreiber.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles” is 2008 tennis event results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Davidoff, Swiss and Indoors, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 33-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Davidoff, Swiss and Indoors is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2008 tennis event results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 1, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q3703750. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles primary sources, 2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles archive and Davidoff research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2008 Davidoff Swiss Indoors – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.