CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2007 Tropfest finalists

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 5, 2021
Entity authorityQ4609437
Source-derived summary

The Tropfest short film festival is held in Sydney, Australia each year. This is the list of 2007's short-listed films and winners.

There was controversy regarding the winning film An Imaginary Life due to similarities to the American television series Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends.

The Story of Ned

Synopsis: John Doyle, as the omnipotent yet not altogether totally reliable narrator, tells the tragic tale of Ned, a little story with a detective yarn for a father and a children's fable for a mother. But in this animation, Ned has a problem: he is a story without an ending.

Director: Simon Weaving

Producer: Simon Weaving

Writer: Simon Weaving

Cinematographer: Dan Miller

Sound design: Mark Webber

Composer: Troy Hambly

Editor: Dan Miller Key

Key Cast: John Doyle, Tony Turner

Length: 6' 50"

The Grey Cloud

Synopsis: This noirish film, set in a crime-ridden city, opens with a man walking a woman down an alley. Nearby is a mysterious piano bar, a place where the music can simply take you away.

Director: Matt Peek, Cam Ford

Producer: Matt Peek, Cam Ford

Writer: Matt Peek

Cinematographer: Cam Ford

Sound design: John Kassab

Composer: Craig Bryant

Editor: Cam Ford

Key Cast: Mick Preston, Katie Astrinakis, John Richards, Brett Cartlidge

Length: 7'

Shot On: Super 16mm

Tropfest Awards: Best Cinematography - Cam Ford

An Imaginary Life (First Prize)

Synopsis: What happens to an imaginary friend once they're forgotten? Where do they go? How do they live?

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2007 Tropfest finalists” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Tropfest, finalists and Open-knowledge can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 5, 2021. The linked authority identifier is Q4609437. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2007.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2007 Tropfest finalists”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2007 Tropfest finalists primary sources, 2007 Tropfest finalists archive and Tropfest research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2007 Tropfest finalists”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from 2007 Tropfest finalists” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.