2006–07 Liga Gimel
Liga Gimel
The 2006–07 Liga Gimel season saw 84 clubs competing in 6 regional divisions for promotion to Liga Bet.
Upper Galilee Division
F.C. Hurfeish and F.C. Julis registered to play in the league, but withdrew without playing.
Beitar Abu Snan was dismissed from the league on 6 February 2007 after failing to appear to a match for the second time.
Beitar Bi'ina was dismissed from the league on 6 February 2007 after failing to appear to a match.
Hapoel Ironi Hatzor was dismissed from the league on 25 April 2007, after failing to appear for a second match in the season. As the dismissal was given with one match left in the season (not including rescheduled fixtures), the club kept its record in the league, and the rest of its fixtures were registered as a 0–2 loss.
Jezreel Division
Promotion play-offs
As Maccabi Beit She'an and Hapoel Kvalim Mesilot finished level on points and matches won, the two clubs met in a playoff match to determine the league winner and promoted club to Liga Bet.
Maccabi Beit She'an promoted to Liga Bet. During the summer, as Hapoel Reineh folded, Hapoel Kvalim Mesilot was promoted as well.
“2006–07 Liga Gimel” enters the record as liga Gimel. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Liga and Gimel can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“2006–07 Liga Gimel” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Liga and Gimel provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q20806637. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006 and 2007.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “2006–07 Liga Gimel”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 2006–07 Liga Gimel primary sources, 2006–07 Liga Gimel archive and Liga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2006–07 Liga Gimel”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “2006–07 Liga Gimel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.