CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2006 Movistar Open – Singles

tennis tournament event

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ679504 ↗
Source-derived summary

Gastón Gaudio was the defending champion, but lost to Rubén Ramírez Hidalgo in the second round this year.

José Acasuso won the title, defeating Nicolás Massú 6–4, 6–3 in the final.

This was the first ATP tournament in which future Grand Slam champion Juan Martín del Potro entered.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2006 Movistar Open – Singles” as tennis tournament event. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Movistar, Singles and tennis.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 48-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Movistar, Singles and tennis providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2006 Movistar Open – Singles”, the useful work is to connect “tennis tournament event” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q679504.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2006 Movistar Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2006 Movistar Open – Singles primary sources, 2006 Movistar Open – Singles archive and Movistar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2006 Movistar Open – Singles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2006 Movistar Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.