CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election

2006 UK local government election

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ5600291 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election took place on 4 May 2006 to elect members of Great Yarmouth Borough Council in Norfolk, England. One third of the council was up for election and the Conservative Party stayed in overall control of the council.

After the election, the composition of the council was:

Conservative 22

Labour 16

Others 1

Election result

Overall turnout at the election was 30.74%.

Editorial summary

“2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election” enters the record as 2006 UK local government election. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Great, Yarmouth and Borough can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Great, Yarmouth and Borough.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Great, Yarmouth and Borough provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5600291. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election primary sources, 2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election archive and Great research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2006 Great Yarmouth Borough Council election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.