CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles

2006 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ3612554 ↗
Source-derived summary

František Čermák and Leoš Friedl were the defending champions, but lost in the semifinals to eventual champions Jiří Novák and Andrei Pavel.

Novak and Pavel won the title, defeating Marco Chiudinelli and Jean-Claude Scherrer in the final, 6–3, 6–1.

Editorial summary

“2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles” enters the record as 2006 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Allianz, Suisse and Gstaad can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 39-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Allianz, Suisse and Gstaad.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Allianz, Suisse and Gstaad provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3612554.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles primary sources, 2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles archive and Allianz research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2006 Allianz Suisse Open Gstaad – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.