CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles

2005 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 7, 2022
Entity authorityQ3888228 ↗
Source-derived summary

This was the first edition of the tournament.

Shinobu Asagoe and Gisela Dulko won the title by defeating Conchita Martínez and Virginia Ruano Pascual 6–1, 7–5 in the final.

Editorial summary

“2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles” enters the record as 2005 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Bangkok, Doubles and tennis can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 29-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Bangkok, Doubles and tennis.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Bangkok, Doubles and tennis provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 7, 2022. The linked authority identifier is Q3888228.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles primary sources, 2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles archive and Bangkok research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2005 PTT Bangkok Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.