CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season

NBA professional basketball team season

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ3858156 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2005-06 Milwaukee Bucks season was the team's 38th in the NBA. They began the season hoping to improve upon their 30-52 output from the previous season. They bested it by ten games, finishing 40–42, qualifying for the playoffs despite finishing last place in the Central Division.

Editorial summary

“2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season” enters the record as nBA professional basketball team season. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Milwaukee, Bucks and season can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Milwaukee, Bucks and season.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Milwaukee, Bucks and season provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3858156. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2005.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season primary sources, 2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season archive and Milwaukee research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2005–06 Milwaukee Bucks season” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.