CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2004 Salford City Council election

2004 UK local government election

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ7404370 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2004 Salford City Council election took place on 10 June 2004 to elect members of Salford City Council in England. The whole council was up for election with boundary changes having taken place since the last election in 2003. The Labour Party kept overall control of the council. Overall turnout was 35.53%.

Editorial summary

“2004 Salford City Council election” enters the record as 2004 UK local government election. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Salford, City and Council can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004, 2003—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Salford, City and Council.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2004 Salford City Council election” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Salford, City and Council provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7404370. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004 and 2003.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2004 Salford City Council election”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2004 Salford City Council election primary sources, 2004 Salford City Council election archive and Salford research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2004 Salford City Council election”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2004 Salford City Council election” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.