CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2004 Siebel Open

tennis tournament edition

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 30, 2025
Entity authorityQ3943426
Source-derived summary

The 2004 Siebel Open was a men's tennis tournament played on indoor hard courts at the HP Pavilion at San Jose in San Jose, California in the United States that was part of the International Series of the 2004 ATP Tour. The tournament ran from February 9 through February 15, 2004. First-seeded Andy Roddick won the singles title.

Finals

Singles

Andy Roddick defeated Mardy Fish 7–6(15–13), 6–4

It was Roddick's 1st title of the year and the 14th of his career.

Doubles

James Blake / Mardy Fish defeated Rick Leach / Brian MacPhie 6–2, 7–5

It was Blake's 1st title of the year and the 4th of his career. It was Fish's 1st title of the year and the 3rd of his career.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “2004 Siebel Open” as tennis tournament edition. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Siebel, tennis and tournament.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Siebel, tennis and tournament providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “2004 Siebel Open”, the useful work is to connect “tennis tournament edition” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3943426. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2004 Siebel Open”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2004 Siebel Open primary sources, 2004 Siebel Open archive and Siebel research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2004 Siebel Open”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from 2004 Siebel Open” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.