CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2004 Canada Masters – Singles

2004 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3654836 ↗
Source-derived summary

Roger Federer defeated the defending champion Andy Roddick in the final, 7–5, 6–3 to win the men's singles tennis title at the 2004 Canadian Open.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “2004 Canada Masters – Singles” as 2004 tennis event results. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Canada, Masters and Singles can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 2004 tennis event results. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3654836. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2004 Canada Masters – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2004 Canada Masters – Singles primary sources, 2004 Canada Masters – Singles archive and Canada research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2004 Canada Masters – Singles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2004 Canada Masters – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.