CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles

2001 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 30, 2023
Entity authorityQ3972896 ↗
Source-derived summary

Todd Woodbridge and Mark Woodforde were the defending champions but only Woodbridge competed that year with Wayne Ferreira.

Ferreira and Woodbridge lost in the quarterfinals to Bob Bryan and Mike Bryan.

The Bryans won in the final 6–3, 3–6, 6–1 against Eric Taino and David Wheaton.

Seeds

The top four seeded teams received byes into the second round.

Editorial summary

“2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles” enters the record as 2001 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Stella, Artois and Championships can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 58-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Stella, Artois and Championships.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Stella, Artois and Championships provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 30, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q3972896. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles primary sources, 2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles archive and Stella research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2001 Stella Artois Championships – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.