CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

2000–01 Croatian Football Cup

Croatian football competition

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ4559826 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 2000–01 Croatian Football Cup was the tenth edition of Croatia's football knockout competition. Hajduk Split were the defending champions, and it was won by Dinamo Zagreb.

Calendar

Preliminary round

First round

Second round

Quarter-finals

Semi-finals

Dinamo Zagreb won 4–2 on aggregate.

Hajduk Split won 4–0 on aggregate.

Final

First leg

Second leg

Dinamo Zagreb won 3–0 on aggregate.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “2000–01 Croatian Football Cup” is croatian football competition. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Croatian, Football and football, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Croatian, Football and football is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “croatian football competition” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4559826. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2000.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “2000–01 Croatian Football Cup”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 2000–01 Croatian Football Cup primary sources, 2000–01 Croatian Football Cup archive and Croatian research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “2000–01 Croatian Football Cup”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “2000–01 Croatian Football Cup” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.