CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

RKM code

notation to specify resistor and capacitor values

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ4836637
Source-derived summary

The RKM code is a notation for the specification of resistors and capacitors, defined since 1952 by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in its standard IEC 60062 (formerly IEC 62). It is also referred to as "letter and numeral code for resistance and capacitance values and tolerances", "letter and digit code for resistance and capacitance values and tolerances", or informally as "R notation". Corresponding national standards include DIN 40825 (1973) of the Deutsches Institut für Normung, BS 1852 (1975) of British Standards Institution, and IS 8186 (1976) of the Bureau of Indian Standards; as well as the pan-European EN 60062 (1993) of the European Standards Organizations. The updated IEC 60062:2016, amended in 2019, comprises the most recent release of the standard.

Overview

Originally meant also as part marking code, this shorthand notation is widely used in electrical engineering to denote the values of resistors and capacitors in circuit diagrams and in the production of electronic circuits (for example in bills of material and in silk screens). This method avoids overlooking the decimal separator, which may not be rendered reliably on components or when duplicating documents.

The standards also define a color code for fixed resistors.

Part value code

For brevity, the notation often does not specify the unit (ohm or farad) explicitly and instead relies on implicit knowledge raised from the usage of specific letters either only for resistors or for capacitors, the case used (uppercase letters are typically used for resistors, lowercase letters for capacitors), a part's appearance, and the context.

The notation also avoids using a decimal separator and replaces it by a letter associated with the prefix symbol for the particular value.

This is not only for brevity (for example when printed on the part or PCB), but also to circumvent the problem that decimal separators tend to "disappear" when photocopying printed circuit diagrams.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “RKM code” as notation to specify resistor and capacitor values. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1952, 1973, 1852, 1975—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where code, notation and specify can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as notation to specify resistor and capacitor values. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4836637. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1952, 1973, 1852 and 1975.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “RKM code”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow RKM code primary sources, RKM code archive and code research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “RKM code”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from RKM code” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.