CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1999–2000 in Portuguese football

overview of association football-related events in Portugal during the 1999–2000 season

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 18, 2024
Entity authorityQ4595666 ↗
Source-derived summary

1999-2000 Portuguese football season.

Portuguese Liga

The 1999/2000 season of the Portuguese First Division began on August 20, 1999, and ended on May 14. Sporting CP became champions for the first time in eighteen years.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “1999–2000 in Portuguese football” as overview of association football-related events in Portugal during the 1999–2000 season. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Portuguese, football and overview can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as overview of association football-related events in Portugal during the 1999–2000 season. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4595666. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999 and 2000.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1999–2000 in Portuguese football”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1999–2000 in Portuguese football primary sources, 1999–2000 in Portuguese football archive and Portuguese research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1999–2000 in Portuguese football”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1999–2000 in Portuguese football” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.