CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles

Doubles

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 29, 2024
Entity authorityQ3883821 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 1999 Swisscom Challenge doubles was the doubles event of the sixteenth edition of the Swisscom Challenge; a WTA Tier I tournament and the most prestigious tournament held in Switzerland. Serena and Venus Williams were the reigning champions, but neither competed this year.

Third seeds Lisa Raymond and Rennae Stubbs won the title, defeating first seeds Nathalie Tauziat and Natasha Zvereva in the final.

Editorial summary

“1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles” enters the record as doubles. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Swisscom, Challenge and Doubles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Swisscom, Challenge and Doubles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Swisscom, Challenge and Doubles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 29, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q3883821. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles primary sources, 1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles archive and Swisscom research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1999 Swisscom Challenge – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.