CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1995 Paris–Tours

1995 edition of the Paris-Tours, cycling road race in France

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 7, 2025
Entity authorityQ3895922 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 1995 Paris–Tours was the 89th edition of the Paris–Tours cycle race and was held on 15 October 1995. The race started in Saint-Arnoult-en-Yvelines and finished in Tours. The race was won by Nicola Minali of the Gewiss–Ballan team.

Editorial summary

“1995 Paris–Tours” enters the record as 1995 edition of the Paris-Tours, cycling road race in France. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Paris, Tours and edition can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Paris, Tours and edition.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“1995 Paris–Tours” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Paris, Tours and edition provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3895922. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1995.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1995 Paris–Tours”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1995 Paris–Tours primary sources, 1995 Paris–Tours archive and Paris research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1995 Paris–Tours”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1995 Paris–Tours” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.