CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles

1995 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 12, 2023
Entity authorityQ3817087 ↗
Source-derived summary

Byron Black and Jonathan Stark were the defending champions, but Black did not compete this year. Stark teamed up with Todd Martin and lost in the quarterfinals to Mark Knowles and Daniel Nestor.

Jared Palmer and Richey Reneberg won the title by defeating Tommy Ho and Brett Steven 4–6, 7–6, 6–1 in the final.

Seeds

All seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles” as 1995 tennis event results. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Kroger, Jude and International.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 64-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Kroger, Jude and International providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles”, the useful work is to connect “1995 tennis event results” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 12, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q3817087. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles primary sources, 1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles archive and Kroger research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1995 Kroger St. Jude International – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.