CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles

1995 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 29, 2025
Entity authorityQ3800125 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ruxandra Dragomir and Laura Garrone were the defending champions; only Garrone competed that year, with Sandra Cecchini. They lost a semifinal to Petra Schwarz and Katarína Studeníková, who lost the final to Radka Bobková and Petra Langrová, 6–4, 6–1.

Seeds

Champion seeds are indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which those seeds were eliminated.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles” is 1995 tennis event results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Internazionali, Femminili and Palermo, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current 60-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Internazionali, Femminili and Palermo is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “1995 tennis event results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 29, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3800125. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles primary sources, 1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles archive and Internazionali research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1995 Internazionali Femminili di Palermo – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.