CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

32nd Golden Horse Awards

award ceremony for Chinese-language films of 1994 and 1995

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 22, 2024
Entity authorityQ15900598 ↗
Source-derived summary

The 32nd Golden Horse Awards (Mandarin:第32屆金馬獎) took place on December 9, 1995, at the Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hall in Taipei, Taiwan.

Winners and nominees

Winners are listed first and highlighted in boldface.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “32nd Golden Horse Awards” is award ceremony for Chinese-language films of 1994 and 1995. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through 32nd, Golden and Horse, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1995—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, 32nd, Golden and Horse is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “award ceremony for Chinese-language films of 1994 and 1995” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 22, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q15900598. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1995.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “32nd Golden Horse Awards”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 32nd Golden Horse Awards primary sources, 32nd Golden Horse Awards archive and 32nd research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “32nd Golden Horse Awards”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “32nd Golden Horse Awards” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.