CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1993 BMW Open – Doubles

1993 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 17, 2025
Entity authorityQ3632043 ↗
Source-derived summary

David Adams and Menno Oosting were the defending champions, but did not participate this year.

Martin Damm and Henrik Holm won the title, defeating Karel Nováček and Carl-Uwe Steeb 6–0, 3–6, 7–5 in the final.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “1993 BMW Open – Doubles” as 1993 tennis event results. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 35-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Doubles, tennis and event can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the history & society register because the source frames it as 1993 tennis event results. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3632043. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1993 BMW Open – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1993 BMW Open – Doubles primary sources, 1993 BMW Open – Doubles archive and Doubles research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1993 BMW Open – Doubles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1993 BMW Open – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.