CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1992 Torneo Godó – Singles

1992 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionDec 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ3994340 ↗
Source-derived summary

Emilio Sánchez was the defending champion, but lost in the second round to Francisco Roig.

Carlos Costa won the title by defeating Magnus Gustafsson 6–4, 7–6(7–3), 6–4 in the final.

Seeds

The first eight seeds received a bye into the second round.

Editorial summary

“1992 Torneo Godó – Singles” enters the record as 1992 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Torneo, Godó and Singles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful synthesis for locating the documentary relationships between formal authority, participants and affected communities. The current 42-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Torneo, Godó and Singles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“1992 Torneo Godó – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Torneo, Godó and Singles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3994340. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1992 Torneo Godó – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1992 Torneo Godó – Singles primary sources, 1992 Torneo Godó – Singles archive and Torneo research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1992 Torneo Godó – Singles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1992 Torneo Godó – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.