CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles

1990 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 28, 2024
Entity authorityQ3784311 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ramesh Krishnan was the defending champion but lost in the semifinals to Scott Davis.

Davis won the 1990 Benson & Hedges Open tennis tournament, defeating Andrei Chesnokov in the final 4–6, 6–3, 6–3.

Seeds

A champion seed is indicated in bold text while text in italics indicates the round in which that seed was eliminated.

Editorial summary

“1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles” enters the record as 1990 tennis event results. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Benson, Hedges and Singles can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1990—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Benson, Hedges and Singles.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Benson, Hedges and Singles provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 28, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q3784311. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1990.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles primary sources, 1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles archive and Benson research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1990 Benson and Hedges Open – Singles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.