CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles

1984 tennis event results

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 29, 2023
Entity authorityQ3746109 ↗
Source-derived summary

Mel Purcell and Stan Smith were the defending champions but lost in the quarterfinals to Wojciech Fibak and Sandy Mayer.

Fibak and Mayer won in the final 6–4, 6–4 against Heinz Günthardt and Balázs Taróczy.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles” is 1984 tennis event results. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Fischer-Grand, Prix and Doubles, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost valuable as an event-and-institution map that identifies actors, dates and record creators for deeper historical inquiry. The current 35-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Fischer-Grand, Prix and Doubles is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “1984 tennis event results” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The record creator and administrative purpose are central evidence, because official documentation reflects both action and institutional priorities. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 29, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q3746109. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles primary sources, 1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles archive and Fischer-Grand research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1984 Fischer-Grand Prix – Doubles” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.