CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

1969 Paraguay plan

Plan to encourage Palestinian emigration

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ110304562 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Paraguay Plan, also known as the Paraguay Scheme, was a plan conducted by the Israeli government led by Golda Meir with the intention to encourage the emigration of up to 60,000 Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Paraguay in the 1960s and 1970s. The plan failed with only a small percentage of the planned number making the journey.

History

Paraguay's motivation

At the time, Paraguay was governed by the authoritarian regime of Alfredo Stroessner, which had agreed to cooperate with the proposal in 1967. Paraguayan authorities reportedly viewed the potential migrants as desirable settlers due to the country's demand for labor and a perception that, as predominantly Muslims, they would be unlikely to sympathize with communist movements.

Israel's plan

The initiative emerged in the aftermath of the Six-Day War, during which Israel occupied Gaza with a substantial Palestinian population Israel wanted to systematically remove, in addition to the Sinai peninsula, East Jerusalem, Golan Heights, and the West Bank. Under the plan, Palestinians in Gaza were enticed to move to Paraguay by "travel agencies" set up in Gaza to promote emigration to Paraguay; those who moved to Paraguay would be given a one-time lump sum of $100, while the Paraguayan government would be paid $33 per Palestinian it accepted, and after five years of residency they were to become eligible for a path to citizenship. Israel would also pay $350,000 to cover the costs for 10,000 Palestinians, meaning the total cost to pay by Israel was $33 million.

Zvi Zamir, the director of Mossad at the time, stated that Paraguay would be willing to accept "60,000 Muslim Arabs who are not communists, according to their definition" and recommended that if the Palestinians were not absorbed and assimilated in the country or caused a scandal related to the deal, Israel should accept them back.

Failure of the plan

While estimates of the exact number of Palestinians sent to Paraguay due to the project vary, ranging from "a few dozen" to "thousands", it is widely agreed that the project was a failure, with the number that made the trip being only a small percent of the 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, around 30 people, the Israeli and Paraguayan governments intended to reach. However, upon arrival, having been left in the country with few resources and with no guarantee of employment, they became destitute.

Editorial summary

“1969 Paraguay plan” enters the record as plan to encourage Palestinian emigration. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Paraguay, plan and Plan can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1967—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Paraguay, plan and Plan.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“1969 Paraguay plan” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Paraguay, plan and Plan provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110304562. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1967.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “1969 Paraguay plan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow 1969 Paraguay plan primary sources, 1969 Paraguay plan archive and Paraguay research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1969 Paraguay plan”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “1969 Paraguay plan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.