1965–66 Liga Gimel
Israeli football season
The 1965–66 Liga Gimel season saw 175 clubs competing in 14 regional divisions for promotion to Liga Bet.
Hapoel Hatzor, Beitar Acre, Hapoel Beit She'an, Hapoel Shefa-'Amr, Hapoel Atlit, Hapoel Zikhron Ya'akov, Hapoel Kfar Yona, Hapoel Rosh HaAyin, David Tel Aviv, Maccabi Ramla, Beitar Beit Dagan, Maccabi Kiryat Gat, Beitar Ashdod and Hapoel Yeruham won their regional divisions and qualified for the Promotion play-offs.
At the Promotion play-offs, Hapoel Beit She'an, Beitar Acre, Hapoel Atlit and Hapoel Zikhron Ya'akov were promoted to Liga Bet from the North play-offs, whilst Maccabi Ramla, Beitar Beit Dagan, Hapoel Rosh HaAyin and David Tel Aviv were promoted to Liga Bet from the South play-offs.
15 clubs did not finish the season due to suspensions and withdrawals.
Upper Galilee Division
Western Galilee Division
Valleys Division
Nazareth Division
Haifa Division
Samaria Division
Sharon Division
Petah Tikva Division
Tel Aviv Division
Jaffa Division
Central Division
Jerusalem Division
South Division
Negev Division
Promotion play-offs
North play-offs
South play-offs
See also
1965–66 Liga Leumit
1965–66 Liga Alef
1965–66 Liga Bet
References
Liga Gimel competed with the World Cup games: Who will finish first...
The public source identifies “1965–66 Liga Gimel” as israeli football season. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Liga, Gimel and Israeli.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “1965–66 Liga Gimel”, the useful work is to connect “israeli football season” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q19903117. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1965.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “1965–66 Liga Gimel”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 1965–66 Liga Gimel primary sources, 1965–66 Liga Gimel archive and Liga research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “1965–66 Liga Gimel”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “1965–66 Liga Gimel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.